Lectures & Training

Bringing real-world courtroom experience to life as a UCLA Law lecturer and private trainer for attorneys and law students.

Bringing Courtroom Clarity and Confidence to Law Students and Legal Teams.

Diane Birnholz teaches Negotiation Theory and Practice at UCLA Law School

Courtroom experience. Academic excellence. Legal training that makes an impact.


As a seasoned Lecturer at UCLA School of Law, Diane Birnholz brings real-world courtroom expertise directly to the classroom. A former federal prosecutor with experience trying high-stakes criminal cases, Diane currently teaches Negotiation Theory & Practice at UCLA Law, and has also taught Criminal Trial Advocacy, Legal Research & Writing, Lawyering Skills, and Civil Trial Advocacy. Her courses equip law students and legal professionals alike with the practical skills, strategic thinking, and courtroom confidence they need to succeed. Her students hail from all over the country and all over the world, as Diane has extensive experience teaching J.D. students (1L, 2L, and 3L) as well as LL.M. and MLS students.


In addition to her UCLA Law teaching, Diane partners with legal organizations nationwide to provide custom legal trainings and workshops. Recent private experiential seminars include attorney training on Negotiation Strategy and a crash-course in Cross-Examination Techniques.


Diane’s teaching style is dynamic, approachable, and rooted in real-world experience. Students have praised her brilliance, clarity, energy, and relatability—so much so that they even attempted to nominate her for “Professor of the Year” (a title she couldn’t claim as a part-time lecturer). She laughs recalling that she once received a lighthearted "Most Likely to Be Mistaken for a Student" award—a reflection of her friendly and fun teaching style and the strong connection she builds with students.


Whether for university lectures or private legal workshops, Diane is available to deliver engaging, courtroom-tested legal education tailored to your needs.

Want to book a lecture or private legal training?

Contact Diane to bring courtroom expertise and engaging instruction to your law school, bar association, or legal team.

Course Topics

Previously taught university courses, private workshops, and proposed future topics

CLE & Professional Workshops

Legal Writing & Learning Materials Samples

By Diane Birnholz May 30, 2025
Teaching Trial Advocacy Through Realistic Legal Hypotheticals
By Diane Birnholz July 4, 2023
One of the first questions I like to ask students in my Criminal Trial Advocacy course is whether they know the difference between state crimes and federal crimes. I’ll give them an example to think about: Why is it a state crime to hold up an employee of a 7-Eleven convenience store with a firearm and steal $5,000, but it’s both a state and a federal crime to hold up a teller at a Bank of America, with a demand note but no firearm, and steal just $1,000? How can that be? Why would an unarmed bank robbery be a federal crime, but committing an armed robbery against a convenience store or a restaurant or a Walmart would be strictly a state crime? If you don’t know the answer, you’re in good company. The students are usually baffled, and these are second- and third-year law students who are interested in pursuing criminal law as a profession. Many of them are headed for the public defender’s office or the district attorney’s office. Someone in the class might offer a tentative guess, but most students don’t really understand why some offenses are only state crimes and why some are both state and federal crimes. The answer is that bank robbery is a federal crime because the deposits are federally insured by the FDIC. The other answer is that bank robbery is a federal crime because it’s codified as such in Title 18, Section 2113 of the United States Code, which is the penal code for the federal government. It’s important to know that the government can’t prosecute someone for a crime unless the crime and the elements of that crime are very clearly laid out in a statute. This is to make sure that citizens are on notice of what constitutes a crime, or not. This is true whether we’re talking about prosecutions by a state or by the U.S. government. Most of the crimes we’re familiar with and hear about every day in the news or on podcasts, like murder and rape and robbery, are state crimes, not federal crimes. Generally, federal crimes are those crimes that the federal government has an interest in, as well as the authority and jurisdiction to criminalize. There has got to be a federal interest involved. Wire fraud is a federal crime because telephone calls involve wires that are part of interstate commerce via telecommunications or the internet. Mail fraud is a federal crime because it involves the U.S. mail. Drug crimes are federal because the drug trade affects U.S. interests and involves interstate commerce, although federal authorities will generally only charge drug crimes when they’re of a more serious nature, such as manufacturing or selling large quantities of narcotics or transporting them across state lines. Murder is a federal crime, per 18 U.S.C. Section 1111, in certain limited circumstances, like when it’s the murder of a federal judge or it’s committed on federal property or by a federal prisoner. Murder is also a federal crime if it’s perpetrated during the commission of other delineated crimes, such as bank robbery or a drug offense. When I was a federal prosecutor, I handled many cases that involved federal firearms crimes, including charges against defendants for being a felon in possession of a firearm, or for the use of a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence. Federal firearms offenses often involve very serious sentencing enhancements on top of the sentences for the underlying crimes. There are various implications that arise from whether a crime is investigated and charged as a state or federal crime. One is that the penalties in federal court are often much stiffer than those in state court. Another is that a federal agency like the FBI or DEA or ATF will generally investigate federal crimes and then present the case to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for prosecution, as opposed to state cases that involve the local police and the local district attorney’s office. If a federal case is indicted, the trial will take place in federal court, and if convicted, the defendant will serve his or her sentence in federal prison rather than state prison. Please let me know if you have any questions about this issue or any other related topics. I really enjoy teaching and educating people about the U.S. legal system, so if any of you have any questions relating to criminal law or law enforcement, please send me a message and ask aw ay!
By Diane Birnholz April 9, 2020
Below is a sample lecture on Closing Arguments I recorded as an extra class session for my students in Criminal Trial Advocacy during COVID. Additional class recordings are available upon request.

EDUCATION & TRAINING

Testimonials

Diane Birnholz teaches Negotiation Theory and Practice at UCLA Law School

It has been a pleasure working with you. Considering the feedback I’ve received, I’m certain more courses will be scheduled in the next quarter(s) and that I’ll be reaching out to you. Thank you and great job!

Attorney Training Firm for a crash course in Cross Examination

A pair of black quotation marks on a white background.

Professor Birnholz is an absolutely delightful professor who explains concepts and concerns in a very digestible and productive way. She also exudes so much enthusiasm for the subject matter and for providing helpful feedback that it made me feel excited to hear what she had to say after every negotiation simulation.

Student, UCLA Negotiation course

Diane Birnholz teaches Negotiation Theory and Practice at UCLA Law School

Professor Birnholz is the perfect instructor for an intro trial advocacy course. She is engaging, extremely knowledgeable in the subject matter and practical skill, and committed to providing each student with consistent and substantive feedback. Perhaps most importantly, her style and disposition creates a welcoming and risk-free atmosphere for a class that has a tendency to be difficult for students.

Student, UCLA Trial Advocacy course

Diane Birnholz teaches Negotiation Theory and Practice at UCLA Law School

Two things were manifestly obvious: Birnholz’s deep expertise in the subject matter, and Birnholz’s skill working in real time with students to variously explain, elicit peer feedback, and encourage improved performance from students as they performed the cross examination. She has an uncommon ability to both uphold high standards while encouraging student improvement. ... The students appeared uniformly relaxed and supported, yet intensely thoughtful and focused at all times. I sensed an extraordinarily high rapport between the students and Birnholz, and the students with each other...

UCLA Colleague, Faculty evaluation

A pair of black quotation marks on a white background.

Professor Birnholz has all the knowledge and skill you would look for in an instructor, but also the patience and willingness to engage on an individual level to make sure everyone actually learns and improves. She provides extensive, detailed individual feedback on every exercise.

Student, UCLA Trial Advocacy course

A pair of black quotation marks on a white background.

Amazing teacher! Kind, brilliant, a pleasure to be in class with. She conducts class in a way that truly facilitates learning. 


Student, UCLA Negotiation course